People are starting to freak out about their project #1. It’s a little strange because I have two weeks before I start filming my project so I feel a bit lazy in comparison to my classmates. I also finished my directing scene last weekend and I’m done editing it as well and I purposefully did this so I could have a less stressful time working on my project #1. So I almost feel like I’m living my life in slow motion while everyone else is going in real time.
Today in cinematography, we were separated into two big groups rather than three as we usually do it. I was DP this time and I’m not sure how good of a DP I am. Lighting is pretty intimidating because it’s one of those things where I can’t see the mistakes immediately. For example, our professor would remark that our lighting is either flat or high contrast, etc and I would not have seen it had she not pointed it out. After realizing the mistake, I have to correct it but that’s where I falter. How do you correct something that you don’t completely understand? I’m still trying to wrap my head around “having the dark side of the face point towards the camera” because people move! Also, lighting gets complicated again when there are two or more people in the scene, many depths and active motions. The other thing is that if I realize my lighting is flat, for example, I might not notice the triple shadows behind the person because I’m focused on unflattening my lighting. That’s kind of what happened from last week, even though I wasn’t the DP for that. We thought we lit the scene well but when we saw the dailies from last week, we could clearly see where all the mistakes were, from the horrible shadows to the overlit foreground.
The other group seemed more cohesive and energetic. Our group was lagging a little and less motivated. I think we were all a bit tired and just wanted to get through the exercise. I think in the end we managed to pull off some dramatic lighting and I photographed some behind the scenes. I’m not too fond of how the groups were sectioned off. I almost prefer the three groups instead. When we had three groups, each person had an individual and specific function. In our large groups, we had way too many grips and even when we had the smaller groups, the grips had the smallest roles in our exercise so I don’t see the point in having so many grips. Maybe the role should be called grip/actor since that was the reason we had to make bigger groups anyway – so we had better use of people in terms of acting.
Anyway, I felt a bit flustered today. Definitely not at my peak. I think up until now I felt like I had to continuously prove to myself, my teachers, and my classmates that I’m not bad to work with, that I’m likeable, and that I am dependable. Now I realize that even though some people in the beginning of the program didn’t make the best impressions, we are all working hard to learn and make an active effort to better ourselves.We can acknowledge our mistakes and move forward.
For example, I noticed some overtaking of sets by non-directors and thought to myself how that is not polite. Then, when I was shooting for my partner, a passerby totally walked through our set and I yelled, “cut!” in aggravation. Although I did say it mostly so the passerby could hear it because she was being rude, I immediately felt like a doofus because that’s exactly the impolite thing I had witnessed before and thought I’d never do that. Now I can only make sure that I don’t do that to anyone else on their set in the future. These kinds of things happen to remind me that I’m not free from these pitfalls and the only thing I can really do is ask for forgiveness and move on.
Later, I met up with some classmates and we went to go watch the Oscar nominated short films at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater, where they even confiscate chewing gum! Well, if I owned a theater that nice, I’d probably make people come in wearing scrubs. My favorite live action short…this is so difficult, but I really liked “On the Line” because of the longing, the guilt, the conflict and suspense. However, I have a feeling that “Toyland” will win the Oscar because it is about the holocaust but with a different angle and has more of an “important” feel. The other films were also really good. I loved “New Boy” because it talked about different cultures (Ireland and Africa) and “Manon on Asphalt” had this Amelie quality to it plus time just seemed to stretch out in this incredibly artistic way. “Pig” was a crowd pleaser and my friends liked it a lot but I don’t think it has much of a chance to win an Oscar. The incredible thing, however, was that it was the director’s first film and SHE is a woman. As for animation, I really liked “La Maison en Petits Cubes” because it was the only non-comedic one, I loved the watercolor look of it (the filmmaker admitted that he’s not really an animator but a painter and he wanted to see his work the way he created it), and the one with the story that tugged at your heart. The other animations were fun and funny. This one is definitely going to win. FOR SURE.




Recent Comments